An Act Regulating the Use of Sidewalks for Commercial Purposes
"Clear Sidewalks Act of 2009."
By Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago
(Sponsorship Speech on 27 May 2009)
"Clear Sidewalks Act of 2009."
By Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago
(Sponsorship Speech on 27 May 2009)
Mr. President, distinguished colleagues:
“A good city is one with great sidewalks.” This is how Mr. Enrique Peñalosa, former Mayor of Bogota, Colombia, differentiates an advanced city from a backward one. Mr. Peñalosa was credited for turning a deteriorated downtown avenue into a dynamic pedestrian public space. He is now the senior international advisor to the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy of New York. He adds that “In a good city, you must be able to walk to buy milk or bread. If you have to get into a car to buy milk or bread it means the city is not well-designed.”
In our country, sidewalks are occupied by vendors and used as illegal transport terminals. Sidewalks are also blocked by illegal structures such as basketball courts, extensions of business establishments, and of all things, barangay halls. Hence, pedestrians resort to walking on the road. This results to traffic congestions, and worse, accidents.
The Supreme Court has declared in several cases including the 1992 case of Dacanay v. Mayor Asistio Jr. (208 SCRA 404), that:
A public street is property for public use hence outside the commerce of man. The right of the public to use the city streets may not be bargained away through contract. The interests of a few should not prevail over the good of the greater number in the community whose health, peace, safety, good order and general welfare, the city officials are under legal obligation to protect.Main Features of the Bill
The objective of S.B. No. 1757 or the “Clear Sidewalks Act of 2009”, is to ensure that sidewalks are free from unauthorized commercial or personal use to facilitate the smooth passage of persons and to clear obstructions to vehicular flow.
It defines prohibited acts and sets 2 exceptions along with the procedure for applying for these exceptions. It sets a penalty of either a fine of P1,000.00 or imprisonment for not more than 30 days or both for a violation of its provisions.
Obligations Under the Bill
A. On the part of the government
The municipal or city government is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this bill. They shall formulate implementing rules and regulations within 30 days from the approval of this bill. Today, it is known that in some local governments, especially in the urban areas, the use of sidewalks for commercial purposes has the inherent blessings of municipal/city or barangay officials. Some collect vendors’ fees, others designate the sidewalk areas as leasable areas for parking and selling of merchandise. The fees are either shared by the municipal or city government or it entirely goes to the barangay where the sidewalk areas are located.
The effectiveness of implementation would therefore hinge on the local governments’ political will and the consequent sanctions they stand to receive for their failure to implement the law.
B. On the part of the citizens
The bill prohibits the use of streets, sidewalks, avenues, alleys, bridges, parks and other public places for commercial or personal use. The bill requires citizens to apply for the temporary use of sidewalks for either community wide special occasions or sales promotion days or civic or charitable purposes.
Benefits of the Bill to the Country
Walkable streets and pedestrian cities is the core concept of livable communities. By clearing our sidewalks, we not only reduce traffic congestion and accidents, we also save ourselves from inflating transportation costs since walking is still the cheapest form of going from one point to another. People can also enjoy healthier lives as they get a regular dose of exercise.
For these reasons, I humbly recommend that this Senate should approve Senate Bill No. 1757.
Labels: bills, Clear Sidewalks Act of 2009, Senate, sponsorship speech
_bookback.jpg)

8 Comments:
A simple yet helpful bill.
The Senate should find no reason not to pass this bill. This bill may be unpopular to the sidewalk vendors but this is for the benefit of the majority of our citizens.
Where's our Miriam? We noticed she rarely appears on TV now. We missed her. We missed the veins on her neck while delivering her privilege speech. We missed the bravado of the Tiger Lady of Asia. We hope she is just honing her swords for the battle in 2010 Presidential Elections.
God bless you Miriam and God bless the Philippines!
Your diehard fans,
Vincent, Ella, Kram and Bhem
This bill should be converted into Law ASAP!
Our country has deteriorated for the benefit of the lawbreakers- illegal Vendors.
you can find a living without congesting the traffic
I have been to Bogota, Colombia, a beautiful and clean city with only 7 million inhabitants, compared with Metro Manila's 15 million people. They do not really have wide sidewalks, but their streets are clean and less congested, unlike ours, and there are police in every corner, which make the Bogotanos feel secure. I guess beautiful people make beautiful cities, and it seems that we can no longer restore the beauty of Manila as it once had during pre-war, post-war era and the 1960s and 70s, because we have become ugly people with ugly and corrupt leaders. Long-term urban planning is what we need in Metro Manila, not just a simple Sidewalk Law. We need to change the water pipe lines, drainage system, fix our eletric poles systems, etc., something which is unlikely given the present system of government that we have.
Please follow this link.
http://filipinovoices.com/judicial-and-bar-council-a-malignant-tumor-that-must-be%c2%a0excised
I cant imagine the Senate w/out our respected Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago.A fighter for Truth and Justice,a true leader of the new generation.More Power to you our beloved Senator.
regarding sidewalk, the main problem usually starts with the building official on the correct implementation of the national building code. Like in the previous administration of the city of Manila, They interpret the code on how they want to, then give you the go around in which that's what has happened to me for 6 long years.If you're poor and don't have the money,time and patient, you better forget it about justice.
The OBO can also make a public street disappear even with tons and tons of supporting government docs shown to him like cadastral maps, old titles etc to support it, their own office cadastral maps, they don't care to see. My problem is still there because the obo wants to give due process to my neighbor who had occupied and closed off the public street for 6 LONG YEARS. The OBO forgot about MY DUE PROCESS.
Happy to say ,our good mayor was able to do the correct legal thing but the obo seems to take his SWEET time in implementation and about due process of my neighbor who had the guts to hallow block walled off the said public street thus blocking off those living inside the said dead end public street.
Post a Comment
<< Home