Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago challenged Pres. Estrada to conduct an
opinion survey in university campuses on the controversial move to amend the Constitution.
Santiago also dared Pres. Estrada to remove charter change as an item
in the nationwide barangay assemblies scheduled for Monday, November 30.
In a privilege speech November 23, Santiago noted that the names
associated with the present cha-cha move are the same names closely associated with the
regime of Pres. Marcos.
She mentioned the names of Pres. Estrada, as secretary of the DILG,
Ronaldo Puno as DILG undersecretary, Eduardo Cojuangco, Jr. as president of the LAMMP
administration party, and Edgardo Angara as one of the most active LAMMP members.
She said that it is wrong for Malacanang to take the initiative in
proposing charter change, because under the Constitution the power to make such a proposal
is given only to Congress.
Santiago pointed out that under the Constitution, there are three ways
by which charter change can be done: First, by Congress acting as a constitutional
assembly; second, by Congress calling for a constitutional convention; and third, by a
peoples initiative to amend the Constitution.
She pointed out that in the case of Santiago v. Comelec, the
Supreme Court last year ruled that it is unlawful at this time to hold a peoples
initiative to amend the Constitution, because Congress has not yet passed a law providing
the procedure to be followed in such a peoples initiative.
Therefore, Santiago concluded, since a peoples initiative is not
feasible, it is only Congress and not Malacanang, which can initiate charter change.
"Pres. Estrada knows as well as I do that the Filipino people do
not seek and do not want charter change at this time," she said.
Santiago noted that "there are no public demonstrations, no
messages in the media, no convocations on the subject by campus or civic groups in favor
of charter change.
"This brainchild was conceived by politicians who cannot win
presidential elections because they are simply unpopular with the electorate," she
said.
Santiago also said it is suspicious that the administration is trying
to tackle two highly controversial and divisive issues at the same time.
"Is cha-cha meant to camouflage the VFA or vice-versa," she
asked.